If test cricket was to be eradicated then the pitch at Nagpur
for the 4th test between India and England, would make an ideal
advertisement.
Not only is it dull but it deviates from all the principles
of worthy test match pitch. Ideally, the basics the pitch should have bounce,
pace and turn. The pace and bounce tend to disintegrate over duration of the
match while the turn becomes prominent. With all the geographic factors, if we get
even one of these basics right then test cricket can still be attractive.
Unfortunately, the Nagpur pitch offered none of the basics which would have
made most spectators yawn and flick to other channels.
Experts and viewers are quick to criticise a pitch if it
favours the bowlers or as it is often the case batsmen and rightly they should,
but even watching runs flows still attracts more views rather a barrage of monotonous
defensive prods.
The statistics from Day 1 yesterday showed there were 97
over’s bowled yesterday out of which 80.3 over’s no runs were scored off. One could argue this was a case because of the
defensive field sets, defensive bowling and defensive batting but realistically
it was nature of the pitch.
To keep it simple cricket is about batsmen scoring runs and
bowlers taking wickets. The pitch in Nagpur, contradicts both the basics of
cricket. Scoring runs is so difficult
due to the nature of pitch even the most attacking batsmen are content to
defend even harmless deliveries. When one of the most captivating batsmen in
world cricket, Kevin Pietersen manages to score at a scoring rate of 38.82, it confirms
the lifeless wicket is appalling for test cricket.
The only way to get a wicket on this wicket is either boring
the batsmen out or wait for him to make a mistake. To sum it up, it doesn’t reward
the batsmen or the bowlers and more importantly the spectators watching at the
ground or on TV.
The pitch could still produce a result over five days and
the criticism will vanish but that would take some dreadful cricket or the pitch
to deteriorate at an alarming rate. If the latter does take effect one then has
to wonder why we weren’t given a dust bowl from Day 1, at least the wickets
tumbling would have made it attractive cricket.
No comments:
Post a Comment