England’s paltry run rate of 2.64 at the end of Day 1 can be
most rational explanation for the exclusion of Mitchell Starc in the fourth
test.
It is the 3rd time in his brief career Starc has
been left out after performing admirably. Last year he was ‘rested’ in Boxing Day
test after bowling Australia to victory over Sri Lanka only few days earlier. Then
once again Starc failed to hold his place in the 2nd Test at Lords
despite his match figures of 5/135 which were more impressive than James
Pattinson.
The statistic that tilted the scales towards Bird over Starc
is the economy rate of the left arm paceman. Apart from Pattinson, Starc is the
only bowler in squad to have an economy rate of above 3 runs an over. In comparison Siddle’s is 2.97, Harris is
2.80 and Bird is 2.82.
On most occasions due to the nature of the modern wickets
and expansion of T20 cricket, the generic feeling is if the bowler can restrict
the batsmen from scoring he will eventually perish. Same theory has existed since the cricket was
played but gone are the days cricket produces a Boycott or Gavaskar. Instead cricket about containment and restricting
the flow of runs.
Mitchell Starc is a victim of the run saving mentality.
Michael Clarke and his think tank believe Starc struggles to keep batsmen in
check. Cricket is all about sizing the
control of the match and while Starc is as likely as any other bowler to
provide that chance, he is also most likely to release the pressure.
In the two Ashes tests Starc has played he has conceded 32
boundaries. Considering he only bowled two over’s in the rain interrupted last
innings at Manchester, 32 boundaries is 3 innings is cardinal sin.
James Pattinson conceded 41 in his four outings, Siddle had conceded
43 until the start of the fourth test, but majority of them have come from
thickish outside edges rather than poor balls. Ryan Harris in the two tests
thus far had only conceded 24, a perfect balance of economy rate and strike
rate.
At the end of Day 1, it was the relentless pressure of Bird,
Siddle and Harris that eventually caused England to implode to Nathan Lyon.
Perhaps had Starc played on a track that looked placid at the end of Day 1, the
English batsmen may not have treated Lyon with such contempt, hence making Lyon
less of a threat.
Starc is a prodigious talent but until he learns to meet the
modern day Test match ideology it is likely he will face such heart breaks once
again.
No comments:
Post a Comment