India's ODI team start a new season this week in Sri Lanka and
while the team selection is as per expected, India are still searching for a distinct
all-rounder. Ideally, the all-rounder should bowl his allocated 10 overs and be
able to bat at number 7. The all-rounder
plays an important role in the team composition and gives the team right
balance. India in the last 5 years have struggled to find the right person and
have tried different compositions. Below are team India's results with the different
compositions.
India over the last 5 years have played 158 matches of which
144 have produced results. Below is table that show how team India has
performed in last 5 years.
India
ODI Last 5 years
|
|||||
Played
|
N/R or
abandon
|
||||
158
|
14
|
||||
Results
|
Played
|
Won
|
Lost
|
Tie
|
Win %
|
Overall
|
144
|
88
|
53
|
3
|
61%
|
In-sub-continent
|
92
|
63
|
28
|
1
|
69%
|
Outside-sub-con
|
52
|
25
|
25
|
2
|
50%
|
As expected India has an outstanding record in the sub-continent
but their winning percentage outside is only 50%. In the 144 matches
Indian team has played in the last 5 years the team has decided on different
compositions according to the conditions. I have broken down the 144 games down
as per the team composition.
Played
|
Won
|
Lost
|
Tie
|
Winning
%
|
|
With 1
all rounder
|
103
|
66
|
34
|
3
|
64.08
|
Asia
|
72
|
50
|
21
|
1
|
69.44
|
Overseas
|
31
|
16
|
13
|
2
|
51.61
|
7
Specialist Batsmen
|
23
|
12
|
11
|
0
|
52.17
|
Asia
|
13
|
8
|
5
|
0
|
61.54
|
Overseas
|
10
|
4
|
6
|
0
|
40.00
|
5
specialist bowlers
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
50.00
|
Asia
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.00
|
Overseas
|
6
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
50.00
|
2 all
rounders
|
12
|
7
|
5
|
0
|
58.33
|
Asia
|
7
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
71.43
|
OVerseas
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
40.00
|
- Yusuf Pathan, Ravindra Jadeja and Irfan Pathan (only when he would have batted in number 7 position) have been classified as the all-rounders. These 3 players have played in majority of the matches. One other player India has used as a distinct all-rounder in last 5 years was Abhisek Nayar (3 matches).
- Second type of composition is playing with the seven specialist batsmen. In each of these occasions the wicket keepers has been classified as a specialist batsmen. India have used 4 wicket keepers in the last 5 years, Dhoni, Patel, Kartik, Ojha and a solitary match for Saha. Although Yuvraj, Raina, Sehwag and Rohit Sharma bowl frequently, each of these players have been classified as a specialist batsmen.
- The only time India have played 5 specialist bowlers was nearly 4 years ago in England under the captaincy of Rahul Dravid. Irfan Pathan is only classified as a specialist bowler if he has batted number 8 or below. (Irfan batting at number 7 was classified into the all-rounder category)
- The 2 all-rounder composition was only used in dead rubbers or when the team has been depleted with injuries and their were desperate measures.
What assumptions can we make from the stats above ? The 5
bowlers strategy has not been applied for over 4 years now and with India
struggling to find a single all-rounder it is highly unlikely that India will play two of them. The statistics
do not favour the 7 batsmen policy but inevitably it was the composition that
won India the world cup. The 1 all-rounder strategy seems the most likely and
it has been used most often. Which all-rounder has performed the best and which all-rounder should India look forward to in the future ?
Below are statistics over the last 5 years of the 4 players who can term as
"all-rounders".
In the all-rounder debate the table below illustrates how
the all-rounders have fared in win, loses, in subcontinent and in Asia.
Yusuf Pathan
|
||||||||
Career
|
Bat Avg
|
Strike Rate
|
Wickets
|
Bowling Avg
|
Eco
|
Bowled 10 overs
|
Bowled less than 5
|
|
Overall
|
54
|
27
|
113.6
|
33
|
41.36
|
5.49
|
5
|
30
|
Matches Won
|
38
|
39.21
|
122.6
|
30
|
32.1
|
5.28
|
3
|
16
|
Matches Lost
|
16
|
16.46
|
96.86
|
3
|
127.12
|
6.04
|
2
|
14
|
Asia
|
35
|
25.83
|
116.83
|
22
|
42.4
|
5.4
|
4
|
19
|
Outside Asia
|
19
|
28.75
|
109.52
|
11
|
39.27
|
5.7
|
1
|
11
|
The most compelling stat is the number of times Yusuf has
bowled less than 5 over's or has not bowled in a match. It is clear indication Yusuf's
place in the team is pre-dominantly as a batsman. Furthermore, Yusuf offers no real variety to the bowling, as he is an right hand off-spinner. Players like
a Suresh Raina, Rohit Sharma provide similar bowling options and are better
batsman than Yusuf.
Ravindra Jadeja
|
||||||||
Career
|
Bat Avg
|
Strike Rate
|
Wickets
|
Bowling Avg
|
Eco
|
Bowled 10 overs
|
Bowled less than 5
|
|
Overall
|
55
|
28.66
|
78.61
|
57
|
38.42
|
4.98
|
19
|
6
|
Matches Won
|
31
|
29.66
|
94.34
|
45
|
26.6
|
4.67
|
11
|
2
|
Matches Lost
|
24
|
29.5
|
29.5
|
11
|
79.54
|
5.32
|
7
|
5
|
Asia
|
40
|
30.16
|
78.92
|
45
|
32.93
|
4.8
|
11
|
3
|
Outside Asia
|
15
|
26.41
|
78.07
|
12
|
59
|
5.41
|
8
|
3
|
Interestingly enough Jadeja's batting average is higher than
Yusuf Pathan's but he's overall strike rate is well below Pathan. Considering
number 7 batsmen role is accelerate the innings at the end, it is an area
Jadeja is lacking in. However, Jadeja's bowling is more potent compared to
Yusuf and he tends to bowl 10 over more often than not. There is not much to be desired about Jadeja's bowling outside the sub-continent. One benefit
Jadeja has over Yusuf is that he provides a left arm spinning option especially
with Yuvraj currently on the sidelines.
Irfan Pathan
|
Career
|
Bat Avg
|
Strike Rate
|
Wickets
|
Bowling Avg
|
Eco
|
Bowled 10 overs
|
Bowled less than 5
|
Overall
|
42
|
18.48
|
76.61
|
50
|
39.04
|
5.68
|
17
|
3
|
Matches Won
|
19
|
15.71
|
74.82
|
26
|
33.92
|
5.48
|
8
|
0
|
Matches Lost
|
19
|
20.18
|
78.58
|
23
|
42.21
|
5.93
|
9
|
1
|
Asia
|
28
|
16.53
|
74.47
|
13
|
48.85
|
5.91
|
6
|
1
|
Outside Asia
|
14
|
21.4
|
79.25
|
9
|
31.88
|
5.97
|
3
|
0
|
From the statistics it is evident that Irfan is most
effective while playing outside the sub-continent. Not only does his bowling
average drop significantly, Irfan's batting average is higher outside Asia. Strangely
enough his batting average is also higher in matches India has lost. In the
matches India has lost, Irfan has faced more deliveries and thus his
batting average is higher, suggesting Irfan can get India out of the crisis if
required. With the next world cup in Australia, Irfan seems like a logical
candidate for the number 7 spot. Additionally, Irfan will inevitably bowl you
the 10 over's and allows India to play two spinners if required.
While that covers all the all-rounder India has played in
the last five years, it is also interesting to look at the statistics of Yuvraj
Singh. It remains to be seen if Yuvraj can overcome his illness and be as
effective again. Below are Yuvraj's stats over the last 5 years.
Yuvraj Singh
|
Career
|
Bat Avg
|
Strike Rate
|
Wickets
|
Bowling Avg
|
Eco
|
Bowled 10 overs
|
Bowled less than 5
|
Overall
|
95
|
40.28
|
88.69
|
61
|
37.24
|
5.04
|
16
|
31
|
Matches Won
|
60
|
52.9
|
91.94
|
46
|
30.78
|
4.88
|
13
|
29
|
Matches Lost
|
34
|
25.73
|
80.86
|
14
|
55.12
|
5.46
|
1
|
17
|
Asia
|
68
|
45.78
|
87.92
|
50
|
32.88
|
4.88
|
15
|
16
|
Outside Asia
|
31
|
30.41
|
90.83
|
11
|
56
|
5.75
|
1
|
15
|
No doubt Yuvraj's batting record is as good as it gets, so
let's look at his bowling. One standout is that Yuvraj's bowling is equally
effective as Jadeja's in the sub-continent. While Jadeja's wickets per match
ratio is better than Yuvraj, the economy and bowling average is almost the
same. Yuvraj has economy of 4.88 to Jadeja's 4.80 and Yuvraj's bowling average
of 32.88 is better than Jadeja's average of 32.93. Outside of Asia, both
bowlers are not effective although Yuvraj still boasts a better bowling
average. From the statistics we can assume if Yuvraj is in the playing eleven
in Asia there should be no place for Jadeja.
Looking ahead India are scheduled to play ODI matches in
South Africa, England, Australia and New Zealand before the next world cup. The
form of Irfan Pathan with the ball and Yuvraj's return to competitive cricket
are two decisive factors that will determine the composition of the team before
the next world cup. Offcourse, India could yet develop another Irfan but
looking through the junior ranks at current that seems like a distinct
possibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment